Rev. ... 2003-07-23, 2004-06-20,
2005-03-06, 2006-05-20, -5-22, -07-23, 2006-10-27
[Search on date pattern to find latest changes, more than one may be found.]
Return to Sitemap
| Intro |
| Construction |
| Ventilation |
| Air Changes |
| Air Flow |
| Condensing Heaters |
| Fans, Blowers, and Compressors |
The purpose of this page is to discuss some of the needs and principles of ventilating a glass blowing studio, including comments based on visits to many studios and online comments in various discussion boards. Several references are made to my hot walls page, so you may wish to start a new browser window (Ctrl-N in Explorer) and load it in that window.
Many studios are overly hot, making it uncomfortable to work
if not actually risking heat exhaustion. The best design seems to
be to have separate exhaust fans with separate air supply for the
furnaces and the blowing floor and to insulate the metal panels
between the two so the heat does not radiate from them.
However, one particularly nice design, that took a lot of planning involves bringing the makeup air out to the floor and blowing it down on the work floor. This is shown at the right in the setup from Vetro Glass Art in Grapevine Texas. This studio also has air conditioning for the next door gallery which blows chilled air down on the bleacher seating at the camera position. 2005-03-06
Note that in the discussion that follows, it is assumed that
there is NO air conditioning. If
there is then it should be completely obvious that everything is
done to keep the AC air where the people are and the hot air
where the furnaces are and to avoid releasing the furnace air
into the cool stuff or sucking the cool stuff into the furnace
space. The setup at Bowling Green
State U (right) is inside the arts building and is heated/air
conditioned with the rest of the building. As you can see, the
entire hot wall is an encased box with large vent stack going off
the top (the smaller tubes in the back are filtered exhausts for
fuming with noxious chemicals.) If this place has a flaw, it is
the limited intake air - when the shipping bay doors are opened
a crack, really cold air comes past the camera position in winter.
VENTILATION - A studio's ventilation system should, if possible, not include free standing fans to shift glass dust around the shop. The exhaust point of the system should be near or above the hottest part of the shop to move both heat and furnace fumes out of the shop. A planned entry point for air should be used and when possible two or more should be provided: one which provide for the best air flow across the work area and another which supplies air during winter to ventilate without chilling the workers. Only one input should normally be used at a time so that air flow velocity is as high as possible for best cooling and removal of dust and fumes. The input should be chosen so that it does not normally pull in dust or exhaust from parking cars. If several openings are provided, normally air will flow over the shortest possible route from input to exhaust, including along walls, bypassing the people in the center. A fan blowing into a building normally provides poor ventilation except for the direct air flow within a few feet of the fan; there are many dead pockets where fumes and dust may collect. Heat shields in front of furnaces may also help control the air flow - with enough surface before the furnace area, it may be possible to have two exhaust fans, one primarily for heat and fume control and one for work area air flow. When possible, work with the prevailing wind, setting exhaust fans into the downwind side of the building and intakes on the upwind side. Drawing air from the shadier side or from under a building may result in cooler air for much of the day. 5/30/95 from Hot Glass Bits #25
Air can be moved by sucking it or blowing it. While standing in a fan feels
good, blowing air into a space is not the best way to ventilate
it - sucking air out is much better. Controlling where the air
comes in with vent panels (windows) is much easier than other
ways. In the sketch at the right I have placed three "windows"
A, B, & C, a door, a work bench and a wall between the work
space and the hot wall space. Think of the "windows" as
places that can either hold a fan/blower or allow the intake or
exhaust of air. The door can obviously also do that also,
depending on where it leads. Be aware that adding screening will cut down
on the free air flow, by as much as 50% depending on the screening. 2005-03-06
To state it up front, my recommendation is that exhaust fans should be placed at B and C, taking air from A and the Door. (Better would be an intake separate from the door, but I didn't offer that.) Let's look at other choices and see what is usually wrong.
A very common choice is to put an exhaust fan at A and take the air in at C (with B not even being provided.) This works under ideal conditions, because air is crossing the room diagonally and air is being taken out from the hottest area. By placing panels or baffles in the hot wall, it can be kept from being too hot in any one place. It becomes a problem when the air being drawn in C is either already hot (late spring in Texas, not to speak of summer) or so cold it freezes the worker (winter up north.) Shutting down C or if C is too small, results in lack of ventilation, hot spots, etc.
Blowing air in through C produces a good air flow just in front of C, which could be aimed at the bench, but the moving air can be felt for only 5-10 feet in front of the fan and there will be dead spots, especially in the area from the word Door to just below the word Bench in the drawing.
Blowing air in through B produces even less flow because the flow is broken up by the hardware behind the wall. Even if A is open as exit, air flow will be diffuse from the center on unless the wall is almost sealed, which is very awkward in use. The higher pressure behind the wall will force hot air out into the work space.
Exhausting air at C produces an air flow across the whole
room, strongest across the center and stronger near C but most of
the air will be moving. It is important that C (and any exhaust
fan) be shrouded* so that power going into the fan will not be
wasted with air simply moving in a short circuit around the fan.
I have been in a couple of studios where a fan on brackets has
been stuck in a window opening and without a piece of plywood or
metal cut to surround the blades, almost all the electricity
going into the fan is merely pushing air in a donut shape, about
1 foot outside the window, turn outward radially a foot, head
back into the building to be sucked out again, pulling almost
nothing from the inside of the building.
[* Shrouded means adding material
so there is little air space at the tips of the blades - this can be a flat
panel with a hole just the size of the rotating blade path, centered on the
blade, but better is a tube supported on such a panel, so the fan turns in a
short tunnel. The most commonly seen small shrouded fan is the "muffin" fan used
for cooling computer equipment. 3005-03-06]
If an exhaust fan is used at A, then air sucked in at B and through any gaps in the hot wall, will flow to the left, taking hot air with it. Ideally A should be higher up, since hot air rises and in the ultimate can be overhead exhaust as long as there is air supplied behind the wall from an intake like B. Many studios use a hood and take the hot air up and out and this is an excellent choice if available.
The air safety and ventilation industry people discuss air changes per hour [AC/hr]. The box below has a suggestion of up to 30 AC/hr which would only be necessary with rather toxic materials. Another source, soon to be published, suggests 1 to 1.25 AC/hr. I think I would be happier with 2-4 AC/hr. To get from AC/hr to air flow per minute, you have to know the cubic feet of the room (height x length x width). Divide that by 60 minutes per hour to get cubic feet per minute (cfm) for 1 air change, then multiply by the number of air changes. If you want to see what the make up air flow will be, you divide the cubic feet per minute by the square feet of the intake opening(s). The cubic feet per minute can used to select one or more air movers (fans, blowers). 2005-03-06
| Item description | Workspace | Units | Example |
| Size of room: Height | feet | 10 | |
| Length | feet | 15 | |
| Width | feet | 10 | |
| Volume (multiply 3 above) | cubic feet |
1500 | |
| Changes per hour (Small number 1-30) |
Changes | 3 | |
| Cubic feet per hour (Changes times cu.ft) |
cfh | 4500 | |
| Cubic feet per minute (divide cfh by 60) |
cfm | 75 | |
| Air flow through 2x2 foot opening (divide by 4) |
ft per min | 18.75 | |
| Miles per hour (times 0.01136) |
mph | 0.2131 |
| Reply to e-mail about ventilation. Unless you can live with the sound of a high speed blower, you are going to have to get at least two additional openings, probably at least 2x2 feet each, one for intake air and one for the exhaust, depending on the blower you get. I would take out a window or take off a door and replace it with another with a hole cut in it to get the changes of air you need. Pete on the group mentions a change of air in the room every two minutes - a room 20x20 with 10 foot ceilings would be 4000 cubic feet so ventilation would have to be 2000 cfm. In a room with this change and air moving through 2x2 foot openings, the air would be moving at 500 feet per minute (2000 cubic feet divided by 4 sq.ft.) or 30,000 ft/hr or 5.7 miles per hour. A 6 inch round opening has only 0.196 sq.ft of opening so air velocity would have to be 10,185 feet per minute, or 611154 feet per hour or 115.7 miles per hour!!!!!!!! | ||||||||||||||||
|
Reply to e-mail question 2002-08
The "standard" for small studios to reduce and
control heat is sheet metal walls between the hot equipment and
the worker with separate ventilation on either side. A
number of good and not so good installations can be found on my
hot walls page. hotwalls.htm
I feel that a metal wall without insulation behind it is just a
huge radiator.
Many studios are set up with exhaust
fans above the hot wall, with or without hoods, but many simply
draw air across the working space, which leads to very cold
drafts in the winter up north and unusable studios down here in
the South in the summer. I strongly feel that a properly
designed studio should make a good attempt at sucking all the
heated air out from behind the wall and have full replacement
intake behind the wall also. Then cooling/moving of
the air in the work space becomes separate task handled on a
much smaller scale.
Most studios, with or without
walls, have some kind of vertical metal panels, either hung or on
wheeled stands that can both be positioned to block the openings
provided for the furnaces/gloryholes when they are not in use and
to block direct radiation on to the worker when in use. The
best picture is in the otherwise un-paneled setup at Hands On
Glass on the hot walls page. Or the last image on the page.
The item I have the least experience with is use of a
flue, which seems to be working on my new furnace even though
undersized. Properly adjusted, a flue should provide exact
combustion control and opening the door should release little or
no hot air. A furnace or gloryhole "without" a
flue uses the door as a flue.
The three sources of
heat are convection, radiation and conduction. Most studios
have little problem with conduction as they know the direct flow
of heat to the surface of equipment wastes energy.
Convection, the movement of hot air, is more of a problem, the
flue and exhaust being considerable solutions as well as
radiation as discussed below. Radiation is strongest from
the opening to the hottest glass surfaces. It is "traditional"
in too many studios that the gloryhole be partially open all
the time because there is no flue - this moderate opening is a
major source of radiant heat and hot air. A fully closing
door can be a major improvement, but even an automatically
closing door can help. Because furnaces are often left on
for months at a time, they are more normally flued, if not very
well, and the door well closed.
Many
glory holes are built with access doors that work well only with
an assistant and thus get opened early and closed late.
None of my photos show one of these in clear detail, but the left hand
glory hole in the lower Bowling Green picture is one
and the huge one at Tacoma is another.
Commonly these are a pair of big doors, with smaller doors within
and a permanent small hole. The various doors are commonly
opened with a rod with a loop on the end. I build my
doors with the handle in the heat shadow of the door so they can
be moved with my bare hand after several hours in use. [for
the record, the really true "traditional" method for
controlling the gloryhole radiation is not have a door at all,
but to lift U-shaped cast refractory plates into place with
arched openings for access. I saw these in use at Steuben
in 1999 during class. An apprentice gets to rearrange them. <Doors since
made pneumatic.>
Of course, in a true production environment, they get changed
only when the product changes.] I have used a
number of mechanically enhanced doors, pneumatic and motorized.
I have found them universally too slow to open and awkward to work, including
finding the control on the floor. But I do think it is a
good idea to keep the doors closed as much as possible. My
solution would be manually open the door quickly and have a
slow moving mechanism to start shutting the door immediately,
where I could lift the door off the mechanism to shut it quicker.
I envision a continuous drive threaded rod with a cutoff switch
when the door is shut and a "half nut" to engage the
screw to carry the door shut. Until I build this thing, I
shall have to remember to "automatically" close the
door when I walk away. Hope this helps, further
questions welcome.
Mike Firth
Furnace Glass Web Site/Hot Glass Bits
----- Original Message ----- From: "Krake, Ann M." <amk3@cdc.gov> To: Mike Firth
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 3:39 PM Subject: Radiant heat
shielding for glass-blowing ovens
> Hello Mr. Firth,
>
> I am an industrial hygienist with the National Institute for
Occupational
> Safety and Health (NIOSH). We're part of the Centers
for Disease Control
> and Prevention, or CDC - sorry for all the government
acronyms! Anyway, I
> have been doing some research for an OSHA consultant in
Oregon who is trying
> to help a local glass blower reduce his exposure to heat
stress. I have
> consulted with our engineering control folks here and have
also searched the
> Internet but have not had any luck in finding a specific fix
for glass
> blowing operations. In reading some of your
newsletters it seems you are
> well-traveled and researched and I was hoping you might be
able to lead me
> in the right direction. I would really like to help
these folks reduce
> their exposures, so any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> Please feel free to contact me by any of the methods listed
below.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ann Krake
>
> LCDR Ann M. Krake, MS, REHS
> Public Health Service
> National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
> 4676 Columbia Parkway, R-11
> Cincinnati, OH 45226
> 513.841.4206
> 513.458.7147 (fax)
> amk3@cdc.gov
Condensing Heat Output
A condensing furnace raises the efficiency of a household heating furnace from
about 85% to about 95% by cooling the exhaust gases to the point that the H2O
generated in burning is condensed. When this is done, the gas is so cool
that it will not rise in a flue/chimney as normal hot exhaust does. As a
result, a blower must be provided for forced exhaust (and a safety switch to
shut down if it fails) but gained is the ability to vent horizontally to a side
wall and to use PVC pipe for the exhaust. In fact, the exhaust is a
coaxial pair of pipes with intake air being pulled in on the outside and exhaust
pushed out the center, which further cools the exhaust. The furnace must
have a good drain as ours puts out about five gallons a day. Further, the
liquid is corrosive since the CO2 from burning makes carbonic acid, any tiny
amount of sulfur in the gas may make sulfuric acid and although temps in a
furnace are not high enough to make a lot, nitrogen can oxidize and that can
result in nitric acid in the water. It is definitely not distilled water.
The method below is to assume an output, 100,000 Btu and work from that
through the chemistry to discover how much water results and then how many Btu's
result from condensing that weight of water.
ELEMENTS OF COMBUSTION
OF NATURAL GAS
1 ft3 natural gas + 10 ft3 air + flame = 8 ft3
nitrogen + 1 ft3 carbon dioxide + 2 ft3 water vapor
[ 1 nat.gas +
2 O2 from air =
1 CO2
2 H2O
CO2 -95 thermochemical calories (1=4.18 international joules) gas
H2O -57.8 heat of formation -54.6 free energy of formation
CH4 Methane heat of combustion 210.8 kg. calories per gram molecular wt
CH4 + 2O2 = CO2 + 2H2O
heat of formation of CH4 = 2(94.38)+4(34.19) -210.8 = +20.34 kg-cal per gram
molecular weight [doesn't match]
| CH4 + 2O2 = CO2 + 2H2O | Primary chemical reaction of burning. |
| 100,000 Btu = 100 cubic feet approx. | Natural gas 1000-1030 Btu/cu.ft. |
| which is 3 m3 approx. | 1 m3=35.316 cubic feet |
| or 2.04 kg. = 2040 gm | Methane density (1.013 bar and 15 °C (59 °F)) : 0.68 kg/m3) |
| with this is 127.5 mol. | Methane 16 gm/mol |
| yielding 255 mol water and 127.5 mol CO2 | Formula above |
| 4,590 gm water and 5610 gm CO2 | Water 18 gm/mol; CO2 44 gm/mol |
| 4.59 liters of water (4.33 quarts) per hour. | Water 1000 gm/liter |
| this much water releases 10,378 kJ on condensing ( 9,836 Btu about 10% bonus.) |
40.7 kJ/mol condensing |
http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/Thermochem/Molar-Heat-Vaporization.html
The units are usually kilojoules per mole (kJ / mol)
Sometimes the unit J/g is used. The first unit is technically the most correct
unit to use.
The molar heat of vaporization for water is 40.7 kJ/mol. Remember the value!!!
Composition of METHANE:
Density (g/cm3) = 6.67151E-04 = 0.00066715
Gas density (1.013 bar and 15 °C (59 °F)) : 0.68 kg/m3
The primary component of natural gas is methane (CH4), the shortest and
lightest
hydrocarbon molecule. It also contains heavier gaseous hydrocarbons such as
ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8) and butane (C4H10), as well as other sulphur
containing
gases, in varying amounts, see also natural gas condensate. Natural gas
can be identified through the presence of ethane, as all natural gas contains
ethane.
A mole is defined in S.I. as Avogadro's number of particles of any kind of substance (atoms, ions, molecules, or formula units). In S.I., this unit is abbreviated mol. The mole is the basic unit of amount of substance. Wikipedia
q = DHvap (mass / molar mass)
The meanings are as follows:
1) q is the total amount of heat involved
2) DHvap is the symbol for the molar
heat of vaporization. This value is a constant for a given substance.
3) (mass / molar mass) is the calculation to get the number of moles of
substance
http://www.eppo.go.th/ref/UNIT-OIL.html
1 kg of LPG = 47.0 cubic feet of natural gas
100,000 Btu = 1 therm
1 calorie (dieticians' Large Calorie) = 4.1855 kilojoules
1 Therm = 100,000 Btu (British Thermal Units) = 25,200 kilocalories =
105,474.6 kJ = 105.48 MJ
1000 kilocalories = 3,968 Btu = 1.163 kilowatt hours
(Large Calories) 3412 Btu = 1 kW
1 kilojoules = 0.94781712 Btu
100 000 Btu = 105 505.585 kilojoules
| Energy Source | Energy Content | Local Price |
| Natural Gas | 37.5 MJ/m3 | $0. _________/m3 |
| Propane | 25.3 MJ/L | $0. _________/L |
| Oil | 38.2 MJ/L | $0. _________/L |
| Electricity | 3.6 MJ/kWh | $0. _________/kWh |
| Hardwood* | 30 600 MJ/cord | $_________/cord |
| Softwood* | 18 700 MJ/cord | $_________/cord |
| Wood Pellets | 19 800 MJ/tonne | $_________/tonne |
Conversion 1000 MJ = 1 gigajoule (GJ)
* The figures provided for wood are for a "full "cord, measuring
1.2 m x 1.2 m x 2.4 m (4 ft. x 4 ft. x 8 ft. ).
Fans, Blowers, and Compressors
There are three groups of devices for dealing with air as stated in the title of this section. They differ by the path of the air and the pressure they will work against.
2006-10-27 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |